2.4 Leadership styles and transformational leadership
The situational studies of Edwin Hollander (1964; 1978) also laid the early foundations for placing Situational (Contingency) models into a dynamic transactional process. This approach focuses on how situations and contingencies change and leadership is bound in how these changes impact the interaction between a particular leader and a particular follower over time.
Burns (1978), and later Bass and Avolio (1995) determined from extensive research (Bass 1985 & 1990; & Avolio 1995) that the determinants of an effective leader is their ability to enhance group effectiveness. Bass and Avolio individually and together (1995) promoted transformational and transactional leadership theories that draw many parallels from McGregor (1960) and Likert's (1961) earlier work. As stated by Avolio:
Transformational leadership would involve establishing ones beliefs and values and being consistent with them; determining the course for change in the future and articulating it as a vision; stimulating coworkers and oneself to challenge traditional ways of thinking; and developing oneself and others to the highest level of potential. (1995)
Bass' study of transactional leaders emphasises how transaction or exchange takes place between leaders, colleagues, and followers. Leadership is based on using this exchange to achieve specific leader expectations. The leader uses the exchange process to guide understanding of the followers and shape action by reinforcing what the followers will receive, or not receive, if expectations are respectively satisfied or not satisfied.
Transformational leadership in contrast with transactional leadership emphasises a different approach to leadership. Transformational leaders use 'higher order' aspects to their relationship with followers to achieve outcomes (Liethwood & Steinbach, 1991). Rather than rely on exchanges transformational leaders motivate followers to achieve exceptional outcomes through setting and communicating visions for outcomes that extend beyond individual self-interest and achieve shared outcomes desired by the group. As such it is the manager who controls and coordinates attainment of goals, while it is the leader that helps shape the vision, articulate the direction, set goals, and orients the teams to outcomes that transform action into goals attainment (Bennis & Nanus, 1985:21, Bennis 1989:46).
Reading 2
Sutcliffe , N (1997), 'The Flamholtz Leadership Effectiveness Framework Overview', excerpted from The Role of Leadership in Business Process Reengineering: An Empirical Study of the Relationship Between Leadership Behavior and the Reengineering Outcome, . Sourced November 2003 at http://condor.depaul.edu/~nsutcli1/IS%20483%20IS%20Managemen t%20Readings/flamholtz_LE_framework.htm .
Reading 3
Parry, KW (16 April, 1998), Leadership Profiles Beyond 2000:How Australian Leadership is Different , Address to the Senior Executive Service of the Australian Public Service; National Press Club, Canberra . Available at http://www.apsc.gov.au/media/parry160498.htm .
Activity 4
Access the above reading from Parry. Now complete the following.
- Do you think this site has confirmed your experience?
- Do you believe Australian styles of leadership are different?
- Compare the findings from Parry with the overview on how Flamholtz views styles as part of the leaders role to manage transformation/change. Are Australian leaders different because there are fewer leaders that Flamholtz would classify under the strategic typology? Are Australian managers predominantly operationally focussed? Are Australian managers, for instance, undertaking more routine/programmable tasks?
- Have you completed a Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) or a Full Range Leadership Questionnaire (FRLQ)? These are only available from commercial providers. However, it may be useful to complete such tools as they will give some insight into your transformational leadership style, as per the original Avolio and Bass parameters.
Activity 5
Before we complete this chapter it is important you understand that while we can given some insight into your leadership style, there are aspects you even hide from yourself! This suggests a formal tests should be completed by a trained psychologist before you get an accurate picture of your leadership styles and associated attributes.
A tool that actually illustrates how individuals - including leaders - can get to understand their deeper aspects is the Johari Window. To examine this tool see Chapman, A (Revised, 2004), Johari Window , at http://www.businessballs.com/johariwindowmodel.htm .
