4.1 Personal development needs and career planning
Identifying, maintaining and enhancing professional practice is not an isolated activity within an organisation. Enhancing any professional practice suggests a concise expression of expected performance and a systematic approach to developing individual competence where capacity falls short of expected performance. As such the study of professional practice needs to firstly address methods of data collection and appraisal of performance expectations.
For many employees the main trigger for development of professional practice-or as we will more commonly call it professional development-comes from performance appraisal systems adopted by the organisation. Performance appraisals centre on:
The process of identifying, maintaining, enhancing and evaluating the performance capacity of employees in the organisation to deliver current and future organisational goals and objectives related to their job role. The process can also enhance communication with the employee in terms of recognition, feedback, isolation of personal development needs and target talent development relating to future career and learning pathways (Bowles, 1999, 2003).
Performance appraisal should be considered as part of the overall training and development system. Such a process would usually integrate individual development and overall strategic performance requirements; as depicted below.

Figure 1 The strategic appraisal cycle

Figure 2 Performance appraisal and interlocking business processes
Shaded areas represent the operational people management activities a manager within the training and assessment (learning) field will usually hold responsibility.
Whether triggered by the performance appraisal process or other activities, assessment of professional practice should result in a development processes that isolates:
- Confirmation of current competencies and/or standards of professional practice;
- Immediate (priority) development needs where an individual's capacity to perform is below that expected in professional practice;
- Personal development choices or development needs for future career or work needs (low priority);
- Options to resolve personal development gaps; and
- Confirmation by all parties of the commitments to implement professional development plan.
Reading 1
Junor, A (1997) ' Lecture 8-2 Issues in Performance Management: Formative Assessment and Individual Development Plans', Unit 3488/HRM2 Lecture 8-2, Performance Appraisal and Competency Based Assessment , Human Resource Management 2, University of Canberra : Canberra . Sourced November 2004 at http://www.canberra.edu.au/uc/lectures/mantech/manpol/sem972/un
it3488/Unit3488+HRM2_Lecture8-2_Performance_Appraisal_and_C
ompetency_Based_Assessment.txt .
Activity 1
Complete the following chart to assess how performance appraisal sessions and processes you may be involved in rank against the listed criteria. The chart lists attributes across two extremes, the planned and formal process (left column) and the les formal or more subjective approach (right column). Ranking occurs by placing a response (a tick) on each line across the spectrum from 1 to 7. For instance on the first line a ranking of 1 (closest to the left hand response) would suggest performance appraisals are very consistent or a ranking of 7 (closest to the left hand column), that the sessions are not at all similar. If you were unsure your ranking would be in the middle column scoring 4. If they were mostly consistent you may respond with a ranking of 2 or 3.
|
1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
|
Consistent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dissimilar |
Known measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective |
Planned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Random |
Comprehensive (everyone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disconnected (Few staff on key issues) |
Known procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appraiser sets procedures |
Records kept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed by appraiser |
Linked to training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No external links |
Management tool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal tool |
Feedback sought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instructions given |
Improving self |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improving attainment of manager's objectives |
Recognising achievements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focussing on faults |
Time consuming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less time consuming |
Subtotals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tally the score for every response from the column head (e.g. 1 though 7) .
Total is NOW = _______
Scoring
62-84
Appraisal and feedback sessions are generally routinised, formal and cyclic. They focus on goal attainment and operational problems. Personal development needs coverage is most likely through indirect or accidental procedures, rather than a deliberate focus. The conduct of the process is also likely to reflect management control, rather than reinforce empowered and participative communication processes.
37-62
Performance and appraisal are more balanced. The processes are likely to balance the needs of the appraiser/manager attaining their goals, whilst, to a limited extent, also acknowledging the needs of the individual employee (appraisee). Achievements are acknowledged and feedback sought, but the means for doing this are often informal or ad hoc. Seeking causes for problems and fault may still be present in the process. The process is still triggered by the management team and controlled by timelines set outside the team or process level's control.
12-36
Appraisal and feedback sessions are targeting known measures and actively seek input from the appraisee/teams; including when sessions are held, feedback and procedures. Management takes a less controlling influence on the appraisal process and seeks feedback from multiple levels within the appraisal and management process. Processes are closely tied to individual improvement and identification of both operational and individual needs.