readings icon presentation iconquiz iconresources icon

6.6 Product life-cycle

As we now understand what a product is, we are able to move on to the realisation that products do in fact have life-cycles with distinct stages. Somewhat like every person experiences a life-cycle between birth and death, so do products experience a life-cycle from introduction into the market to decline and withdrawal. You need to be aware of the characteristics of each stage, but, remember, the length of each stage varies from product to product, and from market to market.

The product life-cycle can be considered at two levels, at the industry level and at the level of individual products. Therefore there is a life-cycle for a product in general in an industry and life-cycles of the same products as marketed by different companies.

Besides the initial product development, your text indicates four stages in the product life-cycle:

Table 6.1 identifies typical characteristics of these different stages for you.

Consider this

Consider for example, the various types of cargo vessels that have been developed this century. Which of them are still in the growth stage and which are in maturity or decline?

Table 6.1 Summary of product life-cycle characteristics, objectives and strategies
 

Introduction

Growth

Maturity

Decline

Characteristic
Sales
Costs
Profits
Customers
Competitors

Low sales
High cost per customer
Negative
Innovators
Few

Rapidly rising sales
Average cost per customer
Rising profits
Early adopters
Growing number

Peak sales
Low cost per customer
High profits
Middle majority
Stable number beginning to decline

Declining sales
Low cost per customer
Declining profits
Laggards
Declining number

Marketing Objectives

Create product awareness and trial

Maximize market share

Maximize profit while defending market share

Reduce expenditure and milk the brand

Strategies
Product

Offer a basic product

Offer product, extensions, service, warranty

 

Diversify brand and models

Phase out weak items

Price

Use cost-plus

Price to penetrate market

Price to match or best competitors

Cut price

Distribution

Build selective distribution

Build intensive distribution

Build more intensive distribution

Go selective: phase out unprofitable outlets

Advertising

Build product awareness among early adopters and dealers

Build awareness and interest in the mass market

Stress brand differences and benefits

Reduce to level needed to retain hard-core loyals

Sales Promotion

Use heavy sales promotion to entice trial

Reduce to take advantage of heavy consumer demand

Increase to encourage brand switching

Reduce to minimal level

Source: Kotler et al. (2004, p. 468)

The product life-cycle can also be presented graphically to help understand the four stages and the impact of sales over time. Figure 6.3 does this, starting with the traditional shape of the life-cycle in the graph in the top left-hand corner. The remaining graphs remind us that the product life-cycle varies a lot in terms of how long the life-cycle lasts and the shape it takes.

 

Figure 6.3 Different product life-cycle patterns

Figure 6.3 Different product life-cycle patterns
Source: based on Quester et al.(2004, p. 302)

Activity 6.5

Consider Figure 6.3 above

  1. Write down brief descriptions of each of the product life-cycles as represented by each of the graphs.
  2. Provide an example of a product which you think represents each of these forms of the product life-cycle.

Turn now to the next reading to review what your texts have to say about the stages and length of product life-cycles.

In your text

Kotler et al. (2004) Chapter 12, pp. 460-469, 'Product life-cycle strategies'.

The diffusion of innovations or the adoption of new products is an interesting process in the life-cycle of a product. Innovations and new products mean, of course, that previous services or products become obsolete. Most people would agree that technological obsolescence is inevitable and beneficial, but planned obsolescence is a controversial area. Yet, even though we deplore style obsolescence, we tend to conform.

It seems, however, that for many years, ports in Australia resisted technological and management innovation. The ports, their management and unions have been, on the whole, laggards when it came to initiating or accepting change, and the country has paid a heavy price for that attitude.

Consider this

Why do you think Australians resisted this change in earlier decades and what price have they paid since doing so? Of the five categories of people ¾ what do you see yourself as in regard to personal consumer goods?

previous page arrow Previous Page - Next Page next page arrow