10.4 Supply chain issues and the push-pull boundary
The classification of supply chains into responsive and efficient supply chains, as made by Fisher, is generally accepted. The same concept is reflected in the somewhat different terminologies of lean and agile supply chains and push-pull systems . Many of the issues identified in Readings 10. 4 and 10.5 relating to the implementation of mass customisation strategies and their workability do point to the inherent difficulty of applying mass customisation across the board to all kinds of products by all organisations.
This observation, of course is, linked mainly to the product and supply chain matrix which we saw earlier, albeit with other important considerations. The main point is that a supply chain, when viewed in the broad context in which we are considering it, may be 'lean' (efficient), 'agile' (responsive) or a 'leagile' (mixture of lean and agile). It is this third category of supply chain or leagile supply chains which are our current focus of attention.
A supply chain which is responsive to customer demands and has the capacity to quickly match demand by postponement or through mass customisation has to be agile at the downstream end to quickly respond to customer demand. The efficiency of the supply chain requires the 'agility' to enable it to meet changing market conditions. On the other hand, the 'leanness' of the supply chain focuses on waste elimination from the supply chain in the upstream section. The overall effect is a supply chain which is responsive and lean and this is the best of both the worlds.
Refer to the example of Toyota in Reading 10.3 and try to understand why Toyota found it so difficult to implement a mass customising strategy. It is essentially because Toyota is the quintessential lean enterprise. All the details you find in the reading regarding Toyota display the hallmarks of leanness; and adapting a lean enterprise to the agile model is not a very pleasant experience.
An agile enterprise on the other hand is market responsive . Christopher (1999) describes an agile supply chain in terms of a supply chain which is virtual, market sensitive, network based and possesses integrated processes. (A full explanation of this definition is provided in the next reading). Again the Dell computers supply chain is a classic example of an agile supply chain.

Figure 10. 4 The agile supply chain (Christopher 1999)
The following table summarises the difference between a lean and an agile supply chain.
Table 10.1 Lean and agile supply chains (Christopher 1999)
Agile supply chain management versus lean approach |
|
Lean Approach |
Agile Approach |
Stock is held at multiple echelons, often based on organisational and legal ownership considerations. |
Stock is held at the fewest echelons, if at all, with finished goods sometimes being delivered direct from factory to customer. |
Replenishment is driven sequentially by transfers from one stocking echelon to another |
Replenishment of all echelons is driven from actual sales/usage data collected at the customer interface. |
Production is planned by discrete organisational units with batch feeds between discrete systems. |
Production is planned across functional boundaries from vendor to customer, through highly integrated systems, with minimum lead times. |
Majority of stock is fully finished goods, dispersed geographically, waiting to be sold. |
Majority of stock is held as work in progress awaiting build/configuration instructions. |
When talking about 'leagile' supply chains it would be instructive to refer to the Benetton example. The Benetton supply chain upstream of the 'plain sweater' must be highly streamlined to eliminate all waste from the supply chain while the portion of the chain downstream of the plain sweater should be highly responsive or agile to respond quickly to market signals. When the supply chain is designed in this way, it is possible to harness the best from both types of supply chains. The concept of a 'leagile' supply chain is very relevant in today's highly competitive market conditions as careful designing of the supply chain in accordance with the concept of 'leagility' would allow a firm to extract maximum benefit from the supply chain.
The critical question, however, is where lies the push-pull boundary or the decoupling point which separates the lean processes from agile processes. Given products and markets are different, there is no standard answer. The decoupling point has to be different under different circumstances. The following reading introduces you to the concepts of lean, agile and leagile supply chains and the relevance of the 'decoupling point'. You will identify that this decoupling point is the point where postponement is effected.
Reading 10.5
Childerhouse, P & Towill, D (2000) 'Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements', Logistics Information Management , volume 13, number 6,
pp.337-345.
Activity 10.4
Refer to reading 10.5 and identify the role of the de-coupling point in leagile supply chains. What effects does the position of the de-coupling point have on supply chain performance?