5.4 Forming participative teams
Put simply, people are far more likely to be committed to an agenda they helped create. To maintain participation in teams, leaders need to:
- Keep the process and 'rules' for involvement simple;
- Make each step in the process gradual and as integrated as possible;
- Acknowledge that individuals will improve as they learn from their involvement in the process;
- Realise group communication and creativity skills are not easy to acquire or harness;
- Accept many values and beliefs cannot be immediately translated into dollar or budge 'bottom line' outcomes;
- Acknowledge individual and group cultural differences and beliefs;
- Accept policy and politics may alter short-term staff functions but a focus on clients needs can be expressed over a longer time span; and
- The final document can be challenged and the only absolute is that actions will align with the document until changes are agreed (ie. the document is a template for change and actions).
Note:
David Stevens' 15 Rules for Involvement:
Rule 1 Big picture in, trivial matters out
Rule 2 Unnecessary examples are out
Rule 3 Speaking in turns saves time
Rule 4 Everybody's a winner, nobody's a loser
Rule 5 Everybody contributes, and everybody's equal
Rule 6 Consensus, not majorities get results
Rule 7 Agenda hidden, is everybody's loss
Rule 8 Silence is golden
Rule 9 Emotive arguments are for wimps
Rule 10 Digressions waste time
Rule 11 Empathise and learn
Rule 12 Ask questions when in doubt
Rule 13 Long windedness often confusing
Rule 14 Exiting is disruptive
Rule 15 Repetition, if unnecessary, means memory loss
(Stevens, 1992:Chapter 2)
Hints
How do you get the most out of participation and cooperation in teams?
- Human and financial responsibilities of the team are united through information sharing process;
- Team members share more information on customer needs;
- Day-to-day management of outcomes is no longer possible for managers with tight time constraints;
- Those who devise outcomes implement outcomes;
- Culture of participation encourages devolution of responsibilities and empowerment;
- Powerful communication tool that can support ownership and personal or social commitments team members have to achieve customer outcomes;
- Co-operative rather than directive use of authority; and
- Quick flow of information throughout the workplace.
Activity 3
Complete the following assessment tool on indications of barriers to cooperation and participation.
| Low Participation | 1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
High Participation |
| Disrespect for other's views | Respect for other's views | |||||
| Contributions and information in jargonistic and complex terms | Clear, distinct and simple language answers and information | |||||
| Arguing between staff | Encouragement by all staff for each other | |||||
| Domination of processes by a few | Contribution to processes by all | |||||
| Low levels of agreement on primary focus | Focus of individuals on tasks | |||||
| Desire of staff to seek different approaches without focus on company outcomes | Innovative approaches sought to improve outcomes | |||||
| Poor progress on resolving problems | Solutions oriented in everyday operations | |||||
| High use of external facilitators to promote change | Little need for external facilitation of internal processes | |||||
| Low levels of acceptance of new ideas and reluctance to explore opportunities | Excitement on dealing with new issues and opportunities | |||||
| One way communication between management and staff | Two-way and multiple pathways for communication | |||||
| Actions after plans agreed to are unknown to participants | Participants allocate and know actions from plans | |||||
| Unwillingness to be committed to goals | Commitment to actioning goals | |||||
| No goal or strategic focus | Clear result areas and corporate goals | |||||
| Irrelevant issues dominate considerations | Relevance is maintained to agreed agenda | |||||
| Little encouragement for ideas and innovative suggestions | Encouragement for diverse ideas and innovative suggestions | |||||
| High facilitator involvement | Involvement driven by participants | |||||
| Rejections of suggestions not fitting supposed planning basis | All suggestions vetted but not rejected until overall review | |||||
| Dominant people | All participants have input | |||||
| Suspicion reigns each input | Open consideration of inputs | |||||
| Exhaustion | Enthusiasm | |||||
| Individuals don't contribute openly due to fear or threat | Open contributions with out fear of sanctions |
(Modified see David Stevens, 1992: Appendix A)
The team leader plays a critical role in the construction and formation of the team. It must be acknowledged that not everyone understands nor embraces the move towards team structures. Individuals may resist change and conflict may arise. Transformation to team structures or movement from one team approach to another requires the leader appreciate the current stage of team development. A traditional way of representing team development has been the four stages team development cycle. This cycle indicates what behaviours may exist and what forms of communication may be usefully employed.