5.1.4 Solutions implementation through inclusive communication processes
Maximising the effectiveness of both the quality and acceptance of a decision is important. If the decision is complex, a manager is more likely to select a group decision-making process than go it alone. If the knowledge required to make a decision is not available from a work group, then the manager may seek an external consultant.
The notion that managers impose decisions on groups is somewhat tempered by the work of Allison. Allison notes that a lot of decisions are not made by managers (Chiefs) but by employees (Indians) and this leads to power struggles among the Indians:
Most problems are framed, alternatives specified and proposals pushed... by Indians. Indians fight with Indians of other departments... But the Indians' major problem is how to get the attention of Chiefs, how to get an issue on an action-channel, how to get the [corporation] 'to do what is right' (Allison, 1971:177).
This usually results in a 'champion' being empowered by a group to take the decision to the Chiefs for ratification. The rivalry of champions becomes an exercise in power and influence. For some managers, rivalry is a control exercise in which individuals are empowered by management to 'bring a decision home'. Regardless of how or why the group decision-making process operates, the role of management is to manage the decision-making process and this involves managing the communication of the group members. To do this effectively, the manager requires a strategic plan in which a range of contingencies and involvements are plotted.
Activity 2
Complete the 'Buzz and Hum' Found in Organisation's with Effective Workplace Relations.
One of the strangest things about organisations that have attained high employee commitment to actions, participative problem solving, efficient management processes and strong workplace relations is the 'buzz' or 'hum' one feels when entering into the workplace for the first time. While consultants and experienced managers and staff can 'feel' this, it is nearly impossible to describe. Nevertheless, despite the plethora or theories on how to achieve this degree of enterprise effectiveness, we can at least ask some indicative questions to examine the measurable indications of an organisation's operating health (Based on J. Gardner, 1965).
Using the range descriptions below each scale (ranked from one to five), circle the numbers that best ranks your response to each requirement. Upon completion reflect on each response and the overall participative 'health' of your workplace.
Download the word document here